Quantum computing steps further ahead with new Labs projects

By Neal Singer

Thursday, January 03, 2019

Peter Maunz and Ojas Parekh standing in front of Sandia facility
TRAPPED FOR THE FUTURE — Sandia researchers, including Peter Maunz (left) and Ojas Parekh, are looking to shape the future of computing through a series of quantum information science projects. As part of the work, they will collab­orate to design and develop a new quantum computer that will use trapped atomic ion technology.  (Photo by Randy Montoya)

Quantum computing is a term that periodically flashes across the media sky like heat lightning in the desert: brilliant, attention-getting and then vanishing from the public’s mind with no apparent aftereffects.

Yet a multimillion-dollar international effort to build quantum computers is hardly going away.

And now, three new projects led by Sandia (and a fourth a year underway) aim to bring the wiggly subject into steady illumination by creating:

  • A quantum computing “testbed” with accessible components on which industrial, academic and government researchers can run their own algorithms.
  • A suite of test programs to measure the performance of quantum hardware.
  • Classical software to ensure reliable operation of quantum computing testbeds and coax the most computational utility from them.
  • High-level quantum algorithms that explore connections with theoretical physics, classical optimization and machine learning.

These three- to five-year projects are funded at $42 million by the Department of Energy’s Office of Science and are part of Sandia’s Advanced Sci­ence and Technology portfolio.

Quantum information science “represents the next frontier in the information age,” said U.S. Secretary of Energy Rick Perry this fall when he announced $218 million in DOE funding for the research. “At a time of fierce international com­petition, these investments will ensure sustained American leadership in a field likely to shape the long-term future of information processing and yield multiple new technologies that benefit our economy and society.”

Partners on three of the four Sandia-led projects include the California Institute of Technology, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Dartmouth College, Duke University, the University of Maryland and Tufts University.

Birth of a generally available quantum computer

Design and construction of the quantum computer itself — formally known as the Quantum Scientific Computing Open User Testbed (QSCOUT) — under the direction of Sandia researcher Peter Maunz, is a $25.1 million, five-year project that will use trapped atomic ion technology.

Trapped ions are uniquely suited to realize a quantum computer because quantum bits (qubits) — the quantum generalization of classical bits — are encoded in the electronic states of individual trapped atomic ions, Peter said.

“Because trapped ions are identical and sus­pended by electric fields in a vacuum, they feature identical, nearly perfect qubits that are well isolat­ed from the noise of the environment and therefore can store and process information faithfully,” he said. “While current small-scale quantum comput­ers without quantum error correction are still noisy devices, quantum gates with the lowest noise have been realized with trapped-ion technology.”

A quantum gate is a fundamental building block of a quantum circuit operating on a small number of qubits.

Furthermore, in trapped-ion systems, Peter said, “It is possible to realize quantum gates between all pairs of ions in the same trap, a feature which can crucially reduce the number of gates needed to realize a quantum computation.”

QSCOUT is intended to make a trapped-ion quantum computer accessible to the DOE scien­tific community. As an open platform, Peter said, it will not only provide full information about all its quantum and classical processes, it will also enable researchers to investigate, alter and optimize the internals of the testbed, or even to propose more advanced implementations of the quantum operations.

Because today’s quantum computers only have access to a limited number of qubits and their oper­ation is still subject to errors, these devices cannot yet solve scientific problems beyond the reach of classical computers. Nevertheless, access to pro­totype quantum processors like QSCOUT should allow researchers to optimize existing quantum algorithms, invent new ones and assess the power of quantum computing to solve complex scientific problems, Peter said.

Proof of the pudding

But how do scientists ensure that the technical components of a quantum testbed are performing as expected?

A Sandia team led by quantum researcher Robin Blume-Kohout is developing a toolbox of methods to measure the performance of quantum computers in real-world situations.

Robin Blume-Kohout
HOW’S THAT WORK IN THE REAL WORLD? — Robin Blume-Kohout is leading a team that will develop a variety of methods that will ensure the performance of quantum com­puters in real-world situations.  (Photo by Kevin Young)

“Our goal is to devise methods and software that assess the accuracy of quantum computers,” Robin said.

The $3.7 million, five-year Quantum Perfor­mance Assessment project plans to develop a broad array of tiny quantum software programs. These range from simple routines like “flip this qubit and then stop,” to testbed-sized instances of real quan­tum algorithms for chemistry or machine learning that can be run on almost any quantum processor.

These programs aren’t written in a high-level computer language, but instead are sequences of elementary instructions intended to run directly on the qubits and produce a known result.

However, Robin says, “because we recognize that quantum mechanics is also intrinsically somewhat random, some of these test programs are intended to produce 50/50 random results. That means we need to run test programs thou­sands of times to confirm that the result really is 50/50 rather than, say, 70/30, to check a quantum computer’s math.”

The team’s goal is to use testbed results to debug processors like QSCOUT by finding problems so engineers can fix them. This demands considerable expertise in both physics and statistics, but Robin is optimistic.

“This project builds on what Sandia has been doing for five years,” he said. “We’ve tackled similar problems in other situations for the U.S. government.”

For example, he said, the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity reached out to Sandia to evaluate the results of the performers on its LogiQ program, which aims to improve the fidelity of quantum computing.

“We expect to be able to say with a certain mea­sure of reliability, ‘Here are the building blocks you need to achieve a goal,’” Robin said.

Quantum and classical computing meet up

Once the computer is built by Peter’s group and its reliability ascertained by Robin’s team, how will it be used for computational tasks?

The Sandia-led, $7.8 million, four-year Opti­mization, Verification and Engineered Reliability of Quantum Computers project aims to answer this question. Los Alamos and Dartmouth College are partners.

Mohan Sarovar
THINKING PROCESS FOR A PROCESSOR — Mohan Sarovar is working to develop software for quan­tum testbeds. Sandia’s quantum computer will play a role analogous to those of graphics processing units in today’s high-performance computers.  (Photo by Randy Wong)

Project lead and physicist Mohan Sarovar expects that the first quantum computer developed at Sandia will be a very specialized processor, playing a role analogous to that played by graphics processing units in high-performance computing.

“Similarly, the quantum testbed will be good at doing some specialized things. It’ll also be ‘noisy.’ It won’t be perfect,” Mohan said. “My project will ask: What can you use such specialized units for? What concrete tasks can they perform, and how can we use them jointly with specialized algorithms connecting classical and quantum computers?”

The team intends to develop classical “middle­ware” aimed at making computational use of the QSCOUT testbed and similar near-term quan­tum computers.

“While we have excellent ideas for how to use fully developed, fault-tolerant quantum computers, we’re not really sure what computational use the limited devices we expect to see created in the near future will be,” Mohan said. “We think they will play the role of a very specialized co-processor within a larger, classical computational frame­work.” The project aims to develop tools, heuris­tics and software to extract reliable, useful answers from these near-term quantum co-processors.

At the peak

At the most theoretical level, the year-old, San­dia-led Quantum Optimization and Learning and Simulation project’s team of theoretical physicists and computer scientists, headed by researcher Ojas Parekh, have produced a new quantum algorithm for solving linear systems of equations — one of the most fundamental and ubiquitous challenges facing science and engineering.

The three-year, $4.5 million project, in addition to Sandia, includes Los Alamos, the University of Maryland and Caltech.

“Our quantum linear systems algorithm, created at LANL, has the potential to provide an exponen­tial speedup over classical algorithms in certain settings,” Ojas said. “Although similar quantum algorithms were already known for solving linear systems, ours is much simpler.

“For many problems in quantum physics, we want to know, what is the lowest energy state? Understanding such states can, for example, help us better understand how materials work. Classical discrete optimization techniques developed over the last 40 years can be used to approximate such states. We believe quantum physics will help us obtain better or faster approximations.”

The team is working on other quantum algo­rithms that may offer an exponential speedup over the best-known classical algorithms. For example, Ojas said, “If a classical algorithm required 2,100 steps — two times itself one hundred times, or 1,267,650,600,228,229,401,496,703,205,376 steps — to solve a problem, which is a number believed to be larger than all the particles in the universe, then the quantum algorithm providing an exponen­tial speed-up would only take 100 steps. An expo­nential speedup is so massive that it might dwarf such practical hang-ups as, say, excessive noise.

“Sooner or later, quantum will be faster,” he said.